Exposing the Vscame Team (reviews)

 

Well then, friends, it's time to lay the cards on the table.

 

After our recent post, where we listed channels in which you will 99% lose your money, admins swarmed into our chat and started frantically making claims: asking where the proof of our words is, some even accused us of being scammers ourselves, and so on.

Let’s reason the other way around: would an honest person run around and justify themselves in some channel? Ask for confirmations, and so on? Promote liars? We do not aim to deliberately attack someone’s project or channel. We talk about a project only when we receive information that clearly shows a person was sold an empty promise, deceived or, God forbid, had their entire deposit drained.

 

Let’s continue...

 

Our long-time subscribers know that we never advertised or recommended anyone. Meanwhile, 99% of channels, including those admins who rushed into our chat, sometimes advertise outright scams, justifying it by saying their project is sustained by that money! An amusing picture emerges: you advertise a channel, take money from scammers, and then say: "But it was just advertising!"

 

You all understand how this chain works: channels promote each other, and in the end many disappear leaving users without money, others run confidence-scheme frauds, and so on, yet despite all this advertising continues to be sold successfully every day. Everyone clearly understands that by recommending a particular channel, admins already know in advance that it will be a 99% scam.

 

So, let’s talk principles and honesty! It turns out I sell advertising on my channel, fully aware that people will be scammed there, but I’m a good guy because it was just advertising, right?

 

Enough philosophy, let’s assume all admins are really stupid and don’t understand who they sell advertising to.

 

Now we ask a simple question and ask you to remember it constantly: what exactly is the scam in our activities?

 

A denouncer claims: "they write about competitor channels!" Again: they write about competitors.

 

So subconsciously our denouncer considers us scammers who write about competitors trying to split the audience (the "mammoths"). Fine, but there is one big BUT: why write about competitors without advertising your own Telegram channels? Almost all sites and channels operating this way publish negative reviews about other resources and then advertise something or cautiously recommend something. We do none of that!

 

That may seem insufficiently convincing, we agree. Let’s focus on facts and stop fantasizing, okay?

 

The administrator of the Neotrading channel claims that we are paid to keep silent about certain channels or that we personally own them. Fine, where is the evidence beyond unsupported statements? Concrete facts, not "maybe"-level fantasies, so the arguments sound weighty, clear and convincing. Such an argument can be easily applied to any other large community, accusing it of secret collusion or friendship with various projects it didn't publicly mention. It's like forcing an owl onto a globe and nothing more. By the way, channels make up only about 40% of our content — we also write about financial pyramids and people! Read our archive on the site: t.me/vScameArxiv

Perhaps, continuing to force the owl onto the globe, one could say that we are not only scammers but also run several pyramid projects... Interesting, isn’t it?

 

Now let's move to the facts!

 

22 December 2025:

We published a post telling the story of a channel that turned from one with 7 thousand subscribers into an empty phantom. Everything built over almost three years was suddenly erased and blocked. In simple terms, one of the administrators was paid a decent sum to liquidate the community.

The question arises: who benefits? Of course, the owners of channels, pyramids and other fraudulent schemes. But since we love forcing the owl onto the globe, let’s put it simpler: allegedly competitors-scammers did it. If that's the case, why not present in the channel proof of our ties to such projects and delete the other publications? Let everyone see! The channel's audience should have full clarity! There is no such proof apart from unfounded guesses and manipulation of facts based on isolated chats.

 

Returning to our words from 22 December 2025: we noted that we regularly faced threats directed at us, but obviously we could not reveal the internal workings of the channel for our own safety - this is understandable to any reasonable person.

About a year ago one of our administrators had his car burned. We knew exactly whose hand it was, because those same people earlier offered money for placing advertising, were refused, offered money for silence, but the key point of the article: we reported on all major projects without exception!

After receiving another "no", forceful measures were taken against us. Clearly, in such a situation we could do nothing but temporarily accept the imposed rules of the game and stop talking about certain projects, because human lives were under threat and we do not abandon people.

However, we were not passive observers: numerous complaints were filed, large-scale work was carried out to identify the perpetrators, and Day X came.

Around December 2025 we received important information about people who were involved in or connected to violent actions against us. We could not publish specific documents or photos because some information would have revealed our real names. Our enemies learned about this quickly.

You probably noticed that from around December 2025 the number of channels with fictitious activity sharply decreased - this is, of course, not direct proof, but a pleasant detail that complements everything we've said.

 

Here’s how the situation developed: we accumulated enough information and facts to dictate terms ourselves and calmly ignore the threats of scammers. Most participants in our channel remain here purely out of their own desire and enthusiastic impulse, not for material gain. Many, after the events, refused to take risks, although they essentially acted as simple editors.

The perpetrators realized we had full data and stopped any aggressive actions against us, understanding that this would lead to loss of anonymity and the exposure of their true faces. One could say a kind of balance of forces was established. Probably that's why there are fewer scamming projects on the Telegram platform now, because the authors openly committed criminal acts and cannot run things as before.

 

Final point:

You claim: "They paid you, so you didn't make posts - it's that simple!" What sense would there be in paying us after threats, car arson and other things? To demonstrate that we fell under their influence and obey them? And then pay afterwards? Then what sense is there in staging provocative threats and pressure? It’s logically obvious even to a child: failing to come to terms with the Vscamе admins, they resorted to forceful attack and began to dictate their terms!

 

Climax:

It becomes known who specifically threatened and committed illegal actions against us, and literally that same day, as if fate had aligned the stars, the channel is destroyed. Shortly after we publish a new post, again emphasizing the situation and its causes.

 

After realizing the threats and risks had passed, we resumed publications and returned to exposing all dishonest practices on Telegram, which predictably angers many channel authors; they try to explain what happened by any means, pulling various chats and correspondences as if forcing an owl onto a globe!

To sum up with a question: is there any real evidence that we are connected with some channels or projects? Is it not possible to call it a scam if we consciously don’t speak about fraud because of the reasons given above? Yet advertising dubious projects on your own channel isn’t considered complicity, right?

 

Whatever conversations or chats you bring now, show at least one solid fact proving our ownership of or patronage over other channels or their owners up to today!

 

Just please don’t forget the circumstances described above, why and under what conditions we were forced to refrain from publishing about specific projects. And do not try to twist the truth and turn what was said into a lie!

 

Yes, we did not write about some projects due to pressure and threats, but we did not advertise or recommend anything - which implies that we have no involvement in scams in any form!

Everything that happened on the channel clearly shows that various threats and actions were constantly directed at us!

 

There is no single piece of evidence except correspondence that can be interpreted differently in one direction or another! But before accusing our project of being a scam - more serious evidence is needed! Not a forced idea: if they don’t write - then they’re scammers! Sometimes circumstances matter more than we do, yet despite everything we never advertised a scam! And we never publicly promoted someone’s goals or interests! Under the slogan - it was just advertising )

 

If you disagree with our story and can’t add 2+2, and are ready to believe the versions of admins who either sell scam advertising or profit from their own P2P schemes, presenting correspondence without any direct proofs as evidence of involvement in a scam - unsubscribe!

 

The channel will continue its activity, because as long as we clearly and bluntly write about scammers, there will always be such reactions. Clowns always and consistently appear and try to prove our connection to scams, but once again, aside from correspondence that only speaks of silence regarding certain projects due to circumstances, there is nothing!

 

We could clean up the chat and block what may destabilize us, but we have nothing to hide — we do not take money for advertising or patronage of certain channels, otherwise such a story would have surfaced long ago and become public knowledge, especially at a time when all publics have started pulling information out of thin air and stitching any nonsense into a line!

And to the admins of publics who suddenly decided they discovered America for their P2P - trying to accuse us of something, I suggest: stop selling advertising if you already know in advance, and often subscribers themselves write that the channel is a scam; if you want to be honest, go all the way )

 

 

 

Good luck to everyone!